Policy Matters Red Bank
It's Junk Science by Brian Froelich


I am supporting Brian Froelich!!!!! Finally a congressional candidate I can trust!!

He is standing up for women’s rights and is a brilliant job creator!!!

https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/radioads

    Let’s be honest. It’s not about the junk science. There were some crazy things said recently but they were crazy with a purpose.

Republican Rep. Todd Aikin (who is a policy blood brother to Republican Reps. Paul Ryan and Chris Smith) effectively said a woman’s subconscious can determine if she gets pregnant. He said as a result of a rape a women’s body can shut down its reproductive mechanisms. Of course this is junk science. And Republicans quickly reacted to the predictable public uproar by castigating Rep. Akin and seeking his resignation from the race. (Two interesting exceptions to that list were former Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee and current Congressional candidate Rep. Chris Smith. Huckabee by his stout defense and Smith by his silence.)

But this had nothing to do with Republicans’ regard for science. In fact science is held in very low regard in the Republican party. This is best exemplified by the fact that the Republicans appointed Rep. Akin to the Congressional Science Committee.

The real subject of Akin’s discussion was not science but rape. And his real purpose was to delegitimize and trivialize rape. His implication is that, since pregnancies don’t really happen by rape, then it can’t be a real or serious reason for seeking an abortion. (Stated otherwise, a woman seeking an abortion for rape is probably lying about really being raped.) Further, his more insidious point is that there must be degrees and types of rape. Hence there must be ’legitimate’ and illegitimate rapes, etc. Of course this is a merely a logical progression from Rep Chris Smith’s proposal to distinguish ‘forcible rapes’ from, apparently, unforced rapes.

Why is it necessary to distinguish between types of rape? There must be a reason. And the reason is simple. Abortion is a simply defined act. If there are types and degrees of rape then rape is not a simply defined act. Rape is not rape. There must be a relative scale where some rapes are worse and some better than others. Some rapes might be important and legitimate and some illegitimate and unimportant. So if you are raising rape as a reason to do, or not do, something, you must further define and defend that rational by further classifying your rape into those categories. And there can be reasonable differences of opinion where different rapes fall on a relative scale. (Like science!)  So, as an example, simple rape alone is not a reason for claiming a simple right to abortion. And once you are on that slippery slope you have lost your moral ground. Rape cannot stand against abortion.

All of this has exactly one purpose- ‘personhood’. Todd Akin, Chris Smith, Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney and the Republican Party all support a constitutional amendment on personhood. A personhood amendment says “we assert the sanctity of human life and affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed”. It says that ‘life’ begins, and is sacred and protected, at conception. It requires the logical destruction of abortion. It abides no exceptions. Rape is not an exception, incest is not an exception, a woman’s health is not an exception. Consequences be dammed. Only the imminent death of the woman can potentially stand astride this mighty and sacred right. Personhood rights also call into legal question many existing infertility, reproductive, and contraception practices

Of course all of that makes sense if you hold that religious position and are willing to legally impose it on women that do not hold it. So, in the end, it is not about junk science it is about religious and personal freedom. Republicans Chris Smith and Todd Akin believe that women have the legal right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness- unless they are pregnant. Based on these Republican religious beliefs, at conception women forfeit their legal rights to someone else. The real point of Akin’s discussion was that women have ceretain rights and the Republicans want to take them away

War on!

Brian Froelich, Democratic Candidate for US Congress (NJ, 4th Dist.)

Brian Froelich is running for Congress (NJ 4th District) as a Democrat against the author of the ‘forcible rape’ language, Republican Chris Smith. Brian obtained advanced degrees at Boston College (BS, Finance), Rutgers University (MBA, Accounting), and Seton Hall Law School (JD).  He is a lifelong New Jersey resident, lives with his wife or 45 years in Spring Lake, and has five children and twelve grandchildren. He is an entrepreneur and has been a successful businessman in both large and small enterprises for decades. Brian has also been active in (and on the Boards of) several civic, business, and charitable organizations.

Rep. Smith no different than Akin on rape

New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith and disgraced Senate candidate Todd Akin are two peas in a pod.

Akin made the ignorant statement that, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.” Even Republican leaders, including Mitt Romney, have condemned Akin, but I do not expect to hear anything from Smith. Why?

Because Smith, like Akin, believes that pregnant victims of rape should be forced to bear their rapist’s child. Smith, like Akin, would deny all rape victims the “morning-after pill” that could prevent a pregnancy. And Smith, like Akin, has worked together to pass legislation that promotes these radical views.

Chris Smith is the ringleader of a group of right-wing extremists who have hijacked the Republican Party. Specifically, Smith attempted to pass a bill that introduced a new category of rape that Smith termed “forcible rape.” Many rape victims would be denied aid for counseling and medical treatment. Smith has also introduced a bill that would outlaw the birth-control pill and other common forms of contraception.

Sadly, the only difference between Todd Akin and Chris Smith’s views is that Smith wasn’t stupid enough to say what he really believes on national TV.

If sensible people in the 4th District of New Jersey knew the real Chris Smith, they would never vote for him.

Joann LaRocca

Lakewood

I want to move from South Jersey. I made this decision after seeing our Governor, Chris Christie disrespect a Veteran Navy Seal who was trying to get answers from the Governor. He knows this merger does not make any sense. The crimes range from fraudulent reporting of SAT scores from Rowan to terrible finances and a poor credit rating. Rutgers, a thriving research institution in Camden is going to pay the price for Rowan’s irresponsible spending. If anything, Rutgers should take over Rowan. I realized that if the people of this state are putting up with this, than this state is not for me. My dreams of going to law school have been destroyed by that bully. I am officially looking at other schools in other states. If the Rutgers - Rowan merger happens the Rutgers School of Law will lose it’s accreditation. It will become Rowan Law and it will take approximately 3 to 5 years to receive accreditation leaving students in limbo until the accreditation takes place. They do not seem to understand that in order to become a practicing attorney, one must graduate from an accredited law school. It simply is a severe loss. Due to this uncertainty, people like myself are looking at UPenn, Drexel, Temple, and several other institutions in Philadelphia to study. You can thank terrible politicians like Chris Christie that have destroyed anything good in NJ. You will see NJ’s talent flooding other states. Hallo Pennsylvania!

Standing up against the radical right.